Monitorings
TL;DR Belarusian state and independent media cite such different speakers that they create two distinct realities. State media completely ignore Svetlana
Research period:October 2025 – January 2026 Author:FactCheck.LT Methodology:Analysis of over 200,000 publications from state and independent Belarusian
How analyzing over 200,000 documents helps identify trends, narratives, and information threats Introduction: Why Manual Monitoring No Longer Works The
Key Findings / TL;DR In November 2025, the information attack on Lithuania reached unprecedented levels. The closure of the Lithuanian-Belarusian border
Citizents of Georgia’s Sakartvelo (საქართველო) gathered in Tbilisi to mark one year since the start of mass protests. The demonstrations began in
TL;DR A comprehensive data-driven investigation by FactCheck.LT revealed systematic coordination among 21 Belarusian TikTok channels with a reach of 5-7
Key findings of the study / TL;DR In October 2025, tensions between Belarus and Lithuania escalated. A detailed analysis of the coordinated actions via
Today we’re reviewing the campaign as of October 30, 2025. The story is still evolving and will require updates as new events unfold. Summary / TL;
Key findings of the study / TL;DR This study revealed a systemic, three-phase disinformation campaign that Belarusian state media used to cover the parliamentary
Key findings of the study / TL;DR September 2025 became one of the most tense months in the information war: the incident with Russian drones in Poland










